![]() ![]() The winger wants to stretch defences while the IW wants to overload them. The winger wants to operate from the wide areas while the IW wants to move inside to do his dangerous work there. The way they operate is what is different. ![]() The blurb on the attacking options is far more similar in that they are both looking to shoot/pass/cross. The winger is a crossing machine and wants to beat his man and whip in a cross (as per the hardcoded instructions), The winger isn't expected to be an excellent passer while it is possible to ask the IW to try more risky passes. Again, the IW doesn't have any crossing preferences but cannot be asked to cross from the byline. As with the support duties one cuts in while the other stays wider. IW-At vs W-At: Both players look to get further forward but the winger will also stay wider when the team has the ball. On support the IW wants to move in front of CB's and play through balls to the strikers (as an example), the winger wants to stay wide and put in crosses early. Winger will cross more often, IW has no instructions relating to crossing. IW will cut inside with ball, winger will run wide with ball. IW-Su vs W-Su: Winger has stay wider, inverted winger has no instructions when team has the ball. If you look at the role's instructions that's the only change, from "stay wider" to "cut inside". ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |